Triple

T18956363
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Flame Nebula E463789 entity
Predicate hasCentralCluster P23187 FINISHED
Object embedded young stellar cluster LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: embedded young stellar cluster | Statement: [Flame Nebula, hasCentralCluster, embedded young stellar cluster]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCentralCluster
Context triple: [Flame Nebula, hasCentralCluster, embedded young stellar cluster]
  • A. hasCluster
    Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a specific cluster or grouping of related elements.
  • B. hasCentralGroup chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a primary or central group within its structure or organization.
  • C. hasPrimaryClusterIn
    Indicates that an entity’s main or most significant cluster is located within or associated with a specified cluster or grouping.
  • D. hasCentralRegion
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a primary or central area within its overall structure or domain.
  • E. hasITCluster
    Indicates that an entity possesses, hosts, or is associated with a specific information technology (IT) cluster.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dcffc278819086792a4ebfddfafa completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5d5cdf2d08190a0aecd3fa5335a75 completed April 20, 2026, 7:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4a2f437648190b85650dae8885d48 completed April 19, 2026, 9:40 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, noon