Triple
T18951174
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Annex (Toronto) |
E463652
|
entity |
| Predicate | borderedBy |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yorkville |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yorkville | Statement: [Annex (Toronto), borderedBy, Yorkville]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Yorkville Context triple: [Annex (Toronto), borderedBy, Yorkville]
-
A.
Yorkville
chosen
Yorkville is an upscale Toronto neighborhood known for its luxury shopping, high-end dining, and cultural attractions.
-
B.
Yorkville
Yorkville is a residential neighborhood on Manhattan’s Upper East Side known for its historic German and Central European roots and its mix of tenements, brownstones, and modern high-rises.
-
C.
Yorkville
Yorkville is a small rural community in Mendocino County, California, known for its scenic wine country setting along the route between the North Coast and the Napa Valley.
-
D.
Yorkville
Yorkville is a small city in northern Illinois that serves as the administrative and commercial hub of Kendall County.
-
E.
Yorkville, New York
Yorkville, New York is a small village in Oneida County that forms part of the Utica–Rome metropolitan area in central New York State.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dcffc278819086792a4ebfddfafa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5d54385e08190903a054681352d11 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:26 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, noon