Triple

T18937410
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cycnus E463283 entity
Predicate intendsToDecorate P88492 FINISHED
Object temple of Ares with human heads LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: temple of Ares with human heads | Statement: [Cycnus, intendsToDecorate, temple of Ares with human heads]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: intendsToDecorate
Context triple: [Cycnus, intendsToDecorate, temple of Ares with human heads]
  • A. hasDecor
    Indicates that one entity possesses, features, or is adorned with a particular decorative element or style.
  • B. relatedDecoration
    Indicates that one decoration is associated with, complements, or is contextually linked to another decoration.
  • C. decoratedFor
    Indicates that an entity has received a decoration, award, or honor in recognition of a specific action, service, or achievement.
  • D. intendsTo chosen
    Indicates that one entity has the purpose, plan, or desire to perform an action involving another entity or outcome.
  • E. containsDecorationFrom
    Indicates that one entity includes or incorporates a decorative element that originates from another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dcfec90481909e926be9767e5779 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5d3e8fdb48190ae70cb23c5bc2c97 completed April 20, 2026, 7:21 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4a2efec5c8190840704016bf547a1 completed April 19, 2026, 9:40 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:59 a.m.