Triple
T1892634
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Colorado Department of State v. Baca |
E41904
|
entity |
| Predicate | supremeCourtCitation |
P4420
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 140 S. Ct. 2316 (via Chiafalo v. Washington) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 140 S. Ct. 2316 (via Chiafalo v. Washington) | Statement: [Colorado Department of State v. Baca, supremeCourtCitation, 140 S. Ct. 2316 (via Chiafalo v. Washington)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supremeCourtCitation Context triple: [Colorado Department of State v. Baca, supremeCourtCitation, 140 S. Ct. 2316 (via Chiafalo v. Washington)]
-
A.
legalCitation
chosen
Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
-
B.
formerLegalCitation
Indicates that one legal citation previously referred to or governed a matter but has since been replaced, superseded, or is no longer the current controlling citation.
-
C.
constitutionalCitation
Indicates a relationship where one entity cites, references, or is grounded in a specific provision or article of a constitution.
-
D.
supremeCourtService
Indicates that an entity serves or has served as a member (e.g., justice or judge) on a supreme court.
-
E.
supremeCourtUseFrom
Indicates that a decision, precedent, or legal principle is utilized or drawn upon by a supreme court from a particular source.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8864b6de0819098d089f6a1b910a7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb1480a6c81909fcf5cce4c42fed4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abafe61bc48190ac9ead027df930e1 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.