Triple
T1892548
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ITU-T G.8262 |
E41902
|
entity |
| Predicate | conformance |
P3994
|
FINISHED |
| Object | equipment clocks claiming synchronous Ethernet support |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: equipment clocks claiming synchronous Ethernet support | Statement: [ITU-T G.8262, conformance, equipment clocks claiming synchronous Ethernet support]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conformance Context triple: [ITU-T G.8262, conformance, equipment clocks claiming synchronous Ethernet support]
-
A.
conformsTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity complies with, follows, or is in accordance with a specified standard, specification, rule, or guideline.
-
B.
consistentWith
Indicates that one entity does not contradict and is compatible or in agreement with another entity, condition, or set of constraints.
-
C.
usesConformanceLevels
Indicates that one entity applies or adheres to defined conformance levels when interacting with or evaluating another entity.
-
D.
hasConformanceRequirements
Indicates that an entity is subject to specific rules, standards, or criteria that it must satisfy or comply with.
-
E.
concurringJustice
Indicates that a justice agrees with the court’s judgment or outcome but writes or joins a separate concurring opinion expressing different or additional reasoning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8864b6de0819098d089f6a1b910a7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb1480a6c81909fcf5cce4c42fed4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abafe61bc48190ac9ead027df930e1 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.