Triple

T18919314
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject County of Mortain E462803 entity
Predicate laterSuzerainty P5603 FINISHED
Object King of France LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: King of France | Statement: [County of Mortain, laterSuzerainty, King of France]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterSuzerainty
Context triple: [County of Mortain, laterSuzerainty, King of France]
  • A. governedUnderSuzeraintyOf
    Indicates that one entity exercises suzerain authority over another, which retains limited internal autonomy but is politically subordinate in key matters such as foreign policy or defense.
  • B. suzerain chosen
    Indicates a relationship in which one entity holds overlordship or supreme authority over another, which remains internally autonomous but owes allegiance, tribute, or obedience.
  • C. formerSovereign
    Indicates that an entity once held sovereign (ruling) authority over another entity but no longer does.
  • D. sovereignStateAfter
    Indicates that one sovereign state succeeds another as its political or legal successor in time.
  • E. laterMonarch
    Indicates that one monarch’s reign occurred after another monarch’s reign in time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dcfdbbb881909964fa5a75bd0b48 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5c629527481909dad169f07df0da4 completed April 20, 2026, 6:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4a2e9e6488190ba8df92c8058ed88 completed April 19, 2026, 9:39 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:59 a.m.