Triple

T1891125
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gliz E41875 entity
Predicate designedToAppealTo P5087 FINISHED
Object children LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: children | Statement: [Gliz, designedToAppealTo, children]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designedToAppealTo
Context triple: [Gliz, designedToAppealTo, children]
  • A. designedToEvoke
    Indicates that something was intentionally created or arranged in order to elicit a particular reaction, feeling, or response from an audience or observer.
  • B. isDesignedFor
    Indicates that one entity has been created, planned, or optimized specifically to serve the needs, purposes, or use of another entity.
  • C. designedToAvoid
    Indicates that something was intentionally created or configured in a way that prevents or minimizes a particular outcome, condition, or interaction.
  • D. marketedFor chosen
    Indicates that something is promoted, advertised, or positioned as being intended or suitable for a particular use, audience, or purpose.
  • E. designedWith
    Indicates that one entity was created, planned, or developed using another entity as a tool, method, or guiding basis in its design process.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8864b6de0819098d089f6a1b910a7 completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb14475448190b291ada3454bf98b completed March 7, 2026, 5:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abafe61bc48190ac9ead027df930e1 completed March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.