Triple
T18906259
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania |
E462470
|
entity |
| Predicate | establishesCourt |
P986
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Court of Appeal of Tanzania |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Court of Appeal of Tanzania | Statement: [Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, establishesCourt, Court of Appeal of Tanzania]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Court of Appeal of Tanzania Context triple: [Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, establishesCourt, Court of Appeal of Tanzania]
-
A.
Judiciary of Tanzania
The Judiciary of Tanzania is the independent branch of government responsible for interpreting and applying the law, administering justice, and overseeing the court system throughout mainland Tanzania.
-
B.
Court of Appeal of Kenya
The Court of Appeal of Kenya is the country’s intermediate appellate court that reviews decisions from the High Court and specialized courts, serving as a key pillar of Kenya’s judicial system.
-
C.
Court of Appeal of Uganda
The Court of Appeal of Uganda is the country’s second-highest court, serving both as an appellate court and, when constituted as the Constitutional Court, as the primary forum for interpreting the Ugandan Constitution.
-
D.
High Court of Kenya
The High Court of Kenya is a superior court of record with broad original jurisdiction over civil, criminal, constitutional, and human rights matters within Kenya’s judicial system.
-
E.
Supreme Court of Kenya
The Supreme Court of Kenya is the apex judicial body in Kenya, responsible for interpreting the constitution, resolving presidential election disputes, and providing final determinations on matters of national legal importance.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Court of Appeal of Tanzania Target entity description: The Court of Appeal of Tanzania is the highest appellate court in Tanzania, serving as the final judicial authority on civil and criminal matters in the country.
-
A.
Judiciary of Tanzania
The Judiciary of Tanzania is the independent branch of government responsible for interpreting and applying the law, administering justice, and overseeing the court system throughout mainland Tanzania.
-
B.
Court of Appeal of Kenya
The Court of Appeal of Kenya is the country’s intermediate appellate court that reviews decisions from the High Court and specialized courts, serving as a key pillar of Kenya’s judicial system.
-
C.
Court of Appeal of Uganda
The Court of Appeal of Uganda is the country’s second-highest court, serving both as an appellate court and, when constituted as the Constitutional Court, as the primary forum for interpreting the Ugandan Constitution.
-
D.
High Court of Kenya
The High Court of Kenya is a superior court of record with broad original jurisdiction over civil, criminal, constitutional, and human rights matters within Kenya’s judicial system.
-
E.
Supreme Court of Kenya
The Supreme Court of Kenya is the apex judicial body in Kenya, responsible for interpreting the constitution, resolving presidential election disputes, and providing final determinations on matters of national legal importance.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dcfd05bc819088903cca13cc2846 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5c52cc9cc8190ac489d36e51693c8 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:18 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:58 a.m.