Triple

T18906259
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania E462470 entity
Predicate establishesCourt P986 FINISHED
Object Court of Appeal of Tanzania NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Court of Appeal of Tanzania | Statement: [Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, establishesCourt, Court of Appeal of Tanzania]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Court of Appeal of Tanzania
Context triple: [Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, establishesCourt, Court of Appeal of Tanzania]
  • A. Judiciary of Tanzania
    The Judiciary of Tanzania is the independent branch of government responsible for interpreting and applying the law, administering justice, and overseeing the court system throughout mainland Tanzania.
  • B. Court of Appeal of Kenya
    The Court of Appeal of Kenya is the country’s intermediate appellate court that reviews decisions from the High Court and specialized courts, serving as a key pillar of Kenya’s judicial system.
  • C. Court of Appeal of Uganda
    The Court of Appeal of Uganda is the country’s second-highest court, serving both as an appellate court and, when constituted as the Constitutional Court, as the primary forum for interpreting the Ugandan Constitution.
  • D. High Court of Kenya
    The High Court of Kenya is a superior court of record with broad original jurisdiction over civil, criminal, constitutional, and human rights matters within Kenya’s judicial system.
  • E. Supreme Court of Kenya
    The Supreme Court of Kenya is the apex judicial body in Kenya, responsible for interpreting the constitution, resolving presidential election disputes, and providing final determinations on matters of national legal importance.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Court of Appeal of Tanzania
Target entity description: The Court of Appeal of Tanzania is the highest appellate court in Tanzania, serving as the final judicial authority on civil and criminal matters in the country.
  • A. Judiciary of Tanzania
    The Judiciary of Tanzania is the independent branch of government responsible for interpreting and applying the law, administering justice, and overseeing the court system throughout mainland Tanzania.
  • B. Court of Appeal of Kenya
    The Court of Appeal of Kenya is the country’s intermediate appellate court that reviews decisions from the High Court and specialized courts, serving as a key pillar of Kenya’s judicial system.
  • C. Court of Appeal of Uganda
    The Court of Appeal of Uganda is the country’s second-highest court, serving both as an appellate court and, when constituted as the Constitutional Court, as the primary forum for interpreting the Ugandan Constitution.
  • D. High Court of Kenya
    The High Court of Kenya is a superior court of record with broad original jurisdiction over civil, criminal, constitutional, and human rights matters within Kenya’s judicial system.
  • E. Supreme Court of Kenya
    The Supreme Court of Kenya is the apex judicial body in Kenya, responsible for interpreting the constitution, resolving presidential election disputes, and providing final determinations on matters of national legal importance.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dcfd05bc819088903cca13cc2846 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5c52cc9cc8190ac489d36e51693c8 completed April 20, 2026, 6:18 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:58 a.m.