Triple

T18899689
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sentinelle Rouge route E462302 entity
Predicate hasCommitmentLevel P27619 FINISHED
Object high LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high | Statement: [Sentinelle Rouge route, hasCommitmentLevel, high]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCommitmentLevel
Context triple: [Sentinelle Rouge route, hasCommitmentLevel, high]
  • A. commitmentGrade chosen
    Indicates the level or quality of commitment one entity has made toward another entity or agreed-upon action.
  • B. hasObligationLevel
    Indicates that one entity bears a specified degree or intensity of duty, responsibility, or required action toward another entity or situation.
  • C. hasConditionalityLevel
    Indicates that one entity is associated with a specific degree or level of conditional requirements, constraints, or dependencies relative to another entity or context.
  • D. coreCommitment
    Indicates a fundamental, central obligation or promise that defines the primary responsibility or dedication within a relationship or agreement.
  • E. eligibilityLevel
    Indicates the degree or tier of qualification an entity has for a given benefit, service, or status.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dcfd05bc819088903cca13cc2846 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5c5289ba48190a6825c4db2e5e48d completed April 20, 2026, 6:18 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4a2e27e1481908a8da10b28f07875 completed April 19, 2026, 9:39 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:58 a.m.