Triple

T1889406
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject BASE experiment E41834 entity
Predicate testsSymmetry P33072 FINISHED
Object CPT symmetry LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: CPT symmetry | Statement: [BASE experiment, testsSymmetry, CPT symmetry]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: testsSymmetry
Context triple: [BASE experiment, testsSymmetry, CPT symmetry]
  • A. isSymmetricAbout
    Indicates that one entity is a mirror image of another with respect to a specified axis, point, or plane of symmetry.
  • B. isSymmetric
    Indicates that a relationship holds in both directions between two entities, so if it applies from A to B, it also applies from B to A.
  • C. usesSymmetryGroup
    Indicates that one entity employs or is based on a particular symmetry group in its structure, behavior, or formulation.
  • D. localSymmetry
    Indicates that an entity exhibits symmetry within a localized region or subset of its structure, rather than across its entire extent.
  • E. isMaximallySymmetric
    Indicates that the subject exhibits the highest possible degree of symmetry allowed by the relevant structure, constraints, or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8864b6de0819098d089f6a1b910a7 completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb142e41881908fc7335673a9dec3 completed March 7, 2026, 5:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abafe61bc48190ac9ead027df930e1 completed March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abb11bfd2c8190a805372589f73238 completed March 7, 2026, 5:01 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.