Triple

T18887000
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gautamiputra Satakarni E461981 entity
Predicate languageOnInscriptions P15804 FINISHED
Object Prakrit LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Prakrit | Statement: [Gautamiputra Satakarni, languageOnInscriptions, Prakrit]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOnInscriptions
Context triple: [Gautamiputra Satakarni, languageOnInscriptions, Prakrit]
  • A. inscriptionsLanguage chosen
    Indicates that the language used in the inscriptions on an object or surface is the specified language.
  • B. secondaryLanguageOfInscriptions
    Indicates that a specified language serves as the secondary language used in the inscriptions associated with a given entity.
  • C. officialLanguageOfInscriptions
    Indicates the language officially used in the inscriptions associated with a particular entity.
  • D. transliterationOfInscription
    Indicates that one text is a direct transliteration of the content of an inscription, preserving its original characters or script in another writing system.
  • E. bellInscriptionLanguage
    Indicates the language in which the inscription on a bell is written.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dcfc3430819095ee6fc0eb4c06a5 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5c4777434819098850da0ee1c6b43 completed April 20, 2026, 6:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4a2e27e1481908a8da10b28f07875 completed April 19, 2026, 9:39 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:58 a.m.