Triple

T1888264
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject IEEE Senior Member E41809 entity
Predicate typicalCandidateRole P18942 FINISHED
Object engineer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: engineer | Statement: [IEEE Senior Member, typicalCandidateRole, engineer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalCandidateRole
Context triple: [IEEE Senior Member, typicalCandidateRole, engineer]
  • A. typicalCandidate
    Indicates that an entity is a standard or representative example of what is usually considered a candidate in a given context.
  • B. typicalRole chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as the usual, characteristic, or commonly expected role or function of another entity.
  • C. possibleRole
    Indicates that an entity is capable of or eligible to serve in a particular role or function in a given context.
  • D. targetCandidate
    Indicates that an entity is being considered or designated as a potential target for selection, action, or further evaluation.
  • E. qualifyingRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a role, position, or function that qualifies or entitles it (or another entity) to participate in a specified activity, status, or relationship.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8864b6de0819098d089f6a1b910a7 completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb12382b481908cd26b56f8558226 completed March 7, 2026, 5:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abafe61bc48190ac9ead027df930e1 completed March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.