Triple

T18882031
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sion Airport E461850 entity
Predicate hasICAORegionCode P25279 FINISHED
Object LS LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: LS | Statement: [Sion Airport, hasICAORegionCode, LS]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasICAORegionCode
Context triple: [Sion Airport, hasICAORegionCode, LS]
  • A. ICAORegion
    Indicates that an entity is located within, associated with, or governed by a specific ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) region.
  • B. hasAirportCodeRegion chosen
    Indicates that an airport code is associated with, or belongs to, a specific geographic or administrative region.
  • C. hasIATAcode
    Indicates that an entity, typically a transportation facility like an airport, is associated with a specific IATA (International Air Transport Association) code.
  • D. ICAOcode
    Indicates that an entity is identified by a specific four-letter airport or aerodrome code assigned by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).
  • E. icaoCodeType
    Indicates that the relationship specifies or classifies the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) code associated with an entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dcfc3430819095ee6fc0eb4c06a5 completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5c3d2028481908af2b1560312e26c completed April 20, 2026, 6:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e4a2e27e1481908a8da10b28f07875 completed April 19, 2026, 9:39 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:57 a.m.