Triple

T1888168
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Republic, Lost E41807 entity
Predicate critiques P170 FINISHED
Object Citizens United v. FEC decision E33469 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Citizens United v. FEC decision | Statement: [Republic, Lost, critiques, Citizens United v. FEC decision]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Citizens United v. FEC decision
Context triple: [Republic, Lost, critiques, Citizens United v. FEC decision]
  • A. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission chosen
    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
  • B. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
  • C. Shelby County v. Holder
    Shelby County v. Holder is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly weakened the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by striking down the formula used to determine which jurisdictions required federal preclearance for changes to their voting laws.
  • D. King v. Burwell
    King v. Burwell is a landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the availability of federal tax credits for health insurance purchased on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act.
  • E. NFIB v. Sebelius
    NFIB v. Sebelius is the landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the Affordable Care Act, notably ruling that its individual mandate could be sustained under Congress’s taxing power.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8864b6de0819098d089f6a1b910a7 completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb12382b481908cd26b56f8558226 completed March 7, 2026, 5:01 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69addf665bd48190b08ff5159333b99b completed March 8, 2026, 8:43 p.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.