Triple
T18878182
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alice |
E461743
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCounterpartType |
P6587
|
FINISHED |
| Object | honest party |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: honest party | Statement: [Alice, hasCounterpartType, honest party]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCounterpartType Context triple: [Alice, hasCounterpartType, honest party]
-
A.
hasCounterpart
chosen
Indicates that one entity corresponds to, matches, or serves as an equivalent or parallel version of another entity.
-
B.
hasSmallerCounterpart
Indicates that one entity has another entity as its corresponding version that is smaller in size, scale, or magnitude.
-
C.
hasCounterpartNameLanguage
Indicates that an entity’s counterpart (e.g., in another context or system) has a name expressed in a specified language.
-
D.
counterpartRelation
Indicates a reciprocal relationship where two entities serve as corresponding or equivalent counterparts to each other in a given context.
-
E.
hasCounterpartNickname
Indicates that one entity is used as an alternative or counterpart nickname for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dcfc3430819095ee6fc0eb4c06a5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5c3cfc4408190a7ae91459f75be52 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e48d22dde8819093b1d963bd673365 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:57 a.m.