Triple
T18871343
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Criminal Investigation Courts |
E461574
|
entity |
| Predicate | collaboratesWith |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Public Prosecutor’s Office |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Public Prosecutor’s Office | Statement: [Criminal Investigation Courts, collaboratesWith, Public Prosecutor’s Office]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Public Prosecutor’s Office Context triple: [Criminal Investigation Courts, collaboratesWith, Public Prosecutor’s Office]
-
A.
Prosecutor's Office
The Prosecutor's Office is the division of the Iraqi Special Tribunal responsible for investigating crimes, bringing charges, and conducting prosecutions before the court.
-
B.
Prosecutor-General’s Office
The Prosecutor-General’s Office is the central public prosecution authority of Timor-Leste, responsible for directing criminal investigations and representing the state in legal proceedings to uphold the rule of law.
-
C.
Public Prosecution Department
The Public Prosecution Department is Iraq’s state legal body responsible for representing the public interest in criminal proceedings and overseeing the enforcement of laws under the country’s judicial system.
-
D.
National Public Prosecutor’s Office
The National Public Prosecutor’s Office is Poland’s central public prosecution authority responsible for directing and coordinating criminal investigations and prosecutions nationwide.
-
E.
Procurator General’s office
The Procurator General’s office was the imperial Russian institution responsible for overseeing legality and supervising the functioning of state administration and courts under the authority of the Senate.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Public Prosecutor’s Office Target entity description: The Public Prosecutor’s Office is a state authority responsible for directing criminal investigations and representing the public interest in prosecuting crimes before the courts.
-
A.
Prosecutor's Office
The Prosecutor's Office is the division of the Iraqi Special Tribunal responsible for investigating crimes, bringing charges, and conducting prosecutions before the court.
-
B.
Prosecutor-General’s Office
The Prosecutor-General’s Office is the central public prosecution authority of Timor-Leste, responsible for directing criminal investigations and representing the state in legal proceedings to uphold the rule of law.
-
C.
Public Prosecution Department
The Public Prosecution Department is Iraq’s state legal body responsible for representing the public interest in criminal proceedings and overseeing the enforcement of laws under the country’s judicial system.
-
D.
National Public Prosecutor’s Office
chosen
The National Public Prosecutor’s Office is Poland’s central public prosecution authority responsible for directing and coordinating criminal investigations and prosecutions nationwide.
-
E.
Procurator General’s office
The Procurator General’s office was the imperial Russian institution responsible for overseeing legality and supervising the functioning of state administration and courts under the authority of the Senate.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dcfb7b9c8190854e7b171b98ea2e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5c2a9dd04819083133ded30337962 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:57 a.m.