Triple
T18869758
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Greek legislative election, 1981 |
E461535
|
entity |
| Predicate | KKEVoteShare |
P133265
|
FINISHED |
| Object | approximately 10.9% |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 10.9% | Statement: [Greek legislative election, 1981, KKEVoteShare, approximately 10.9%]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: KKEVoteShare Context triple: [Greek legislative election, 1981, KKEVoteShare, approximately 10.9%]
-
A.
KPDVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes that were cast in favor of the KPD in a given election or electoral context.
-
B.
AKPVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes received by the AKP in a given election or electoral unit.
-
C.
CHPVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes received by the CHP in a given election or voting context.
-
D.
SPDVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes that were cast for the SPD in a given election or electoral context.
-
E.
AlliancePopularVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes received by a political alliance in an election relative to all valid votes cast.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dcfb7b9c8190854e7b171b98ea2e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5c2a8c8208190a3d709e96ebe184f |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e48d2166b88190add38de96cedc65c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e49785fd7081909577e90a55df0a35 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:57 a.m.