Triple

T18858714
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ulanga River E461247 entity
Predicate threatTypeInStory P50110 FINISHED
Object natural danger LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: natural danger | Statement: [Ulanga River, threatTypeInStory, natural danger]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: threatTypeInStory
Context triple: [Ulanga River, threatTypeInStory, natural danger]
  • A. threatInStory
    Indicates that one entity poses or represents a danger, menace, or harmful intent toward another entity within the context of a narrative or story.
  • B. threatType chosen
    Indicates the specific category or nature of a threat that one entity poses or represents in relation to another.
  • C. threatCategory
    Indicates the classification of a threat according to its type, severity, or nature within a defined risk or security framework.
  • D. threatContained
    Indicates that an identified threat has been successfully neutralized, controlled, or otherwise prevented from causing further harm or escalation.
  • E. threatTypeAddressed
    Indicates that a given action, measure, or entity is specifically intended to counter or mitigate a particular type of threat.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dcfb7b9c8190854e7b171b98ea2e completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5c05eaee881909da704cf1374158c completed April 20, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e48d2166b88190add38de96cedc65c completed April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:57 a.m.