Triple

T18845798
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject C6 E460908 entity
Predicate hasNoLegislativePower P133160 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [C6, hasNoLegislativePower, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNoLegislativePower
Context triple: [C6, hasNoLegislativePower, true]
  • A. hasLegislativePower
    Indicates that an entity possesses the authority to create, amend, or repeal laws within a given jurisdiction or governing framework.
  • B. excludesFromLegislativePower
    Indicates that one entity is not subject to, or is placed outside the scope of, another entity’s authority to create or apply legislation.
  • C. hasNoFormalConstitutionalStatus
    Indicates that the entity lacks any officially recognized status or role within a formal constitutional framework.
  • D. cannotLegislateOn
    Indicates that one entity lacks the authority or legal power to create, modify, or enact laws concerning a specified subject, domain, or other entity.
  • E. hasConcurrentLegislativePowers
    Indicates that two or more governing bodies share the authority to legislate on the same subject matter at the same time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8dcfa11e4819090ab1ef5bdcd2b2e completed April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5b8ee96988190bf247b986777945c completed April 20, 2026, 5:26 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e48d1e7dac81909ea1e758c87773c5 completed April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e49785fd7081909577e90a55df0a35 completed April 19, 2026, 8:51 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:56 a.m.