Triple
T18843745
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Góra County |
E460860
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRuralGmina |
P46876
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Niechlów |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Niechlów | Statement: [Góra County, hasRuralGmina, Gmina Niechlów]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Niechlów Context triple: [Góra County, hasRuralGmina, Gmina Niechlów]
-
A.
Gmina Niechlów
chosen
Gmina Niechlów is a rural administrative district in southwestern Poland known for its agricultural landscape and small villages.
-
B.
Gmina Nielisz
Gmina Nielisz is a rural administrative district in eastern Poland, located within the Lublin Voivodeship.
-
C.
Gmina Chełmiec
Gmina Chełmiec is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship near the city of Nowy Sącz.
-
D.
Gmina Niepołomice
Gmina Niepołomice is an administrative district in southern Poland that includes the town of Niepołomice and surrounding villages within the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
E.
Gmina Niegosławice
Gmina Niegosławice is a rural administrative district in western Poland, situated in the Lubusz Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8dcfa11e4819090ab1ef5bdcd2b2e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:20 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5b8ec8c5c8190b15e6394d0018573 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:26 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:56 a.m.