Triple
T18815963
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Love Field |
E460133
|
entity |
| Predicate | WrightAmendmentStatus |
P23223
|
FINISHED |
| Object | most restrictions repealed in 2014 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: most restrictions repealed in 2014 | Statement: [Love Field, WrightAmendmentStatus, most restrictions repealed in 2014]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: WrightAmendmentStatus Context triple: [Love Field, WrightAmendmentStatus, most restrictions repealed in 2014]
-
A.
constitutionalAmendmentStatus
Indicates the legal status or stage of progress of a proposed or existing constitutional amendment within a constitutional process.
-
B.
amendmentStatus
chosen
Indicates the current state or phase of an amendment within its lifecycle (e.g., proposed, pending, approved, rejected, or superseded).
-
C.
constitutionalAmendmentInvolved
Indicates that a specific constitutional amendment is directly relevant to, affects, or is implicated in the described situation, case, or action.
-
D.
canAmendConstitution
Indicates that an entity has the authority or power to modify or revise a constitution.
-
E.
proposedAmendment
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested a change or addition (an amendment) to another entity, such as a document, law, or agreement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d398c7d4819091cb2f7e48948aeb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5a3e092e081908fc310c70f646e79 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e48d1b10ec8190985c6fb5766ff981 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:53 a.m.