Triple
T18815842
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | beryllium |
E460131
|
entity |
| Predicate | oxideFormula |
P23158
|
FINISHED |
| Object | BeO |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: BeO | Statement: [beryllium, oxideFormula, BeO]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: oxideFormula Context triple: [beryllium, oxideFormula, BeO]
-
A.
hasFormalOxidationStateOfMetal
Indicates that a metal entity is assigned a specific formal oxidation state in a chemical context.
-
B.
oxidationStates
Indicates the specific oxidation numbers assigned to an element or atom within a chemical species, reflecting its electron loss or gain state in that context.
-
C.
oxidizer
Indicates a relationship where one entity acts as an oxidizing agent that accepts electrons from, or promotes the oxidation of, another entity in a chemical process.
-
D.
formsOxideLayer
Indicates that one entity reacts with oxygen to create and maintain a surface oxide layer on another entity.
-
E.
hasChemicalFormula
chosen
Indicates that one entity (typically a chemical substance) is characterized by or associated with a specific chemical formula representing its elemental composition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d398c7d4819091cb2f7e48948aeb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5a3e092e081908fc310c70f646e79 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e48d1b10ec8190985c6fb5766ff981 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:53 a.m.