Triple
T18805601
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mia Warren |
E459864
|
entity |
| Predicate | housingStatus |
P105495
|
FINISHED |
| Object | tenant of Elena Richardson |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tenant of Elena Richardson | Statement: [Mia Warren, housingStatus, tenant of Elena Richardson]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: housingStatus Context triple: [Mia Warren, housingStatus, tenant of Elena Richardson]
-
A.
homeStatus
Indicates the current condition or state of a home in relation to a specified context (such as occupancy, availability, or operational status).
-
B.
residenceStatus
Indicates the type or condition of an entity’s living arrangement or place of residence in relation to a specified location.
-
C.
hasHousingArrangement
chosen
Indicates that an entity has a specific type or status of housing or living arrangement in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
hasHousingAccess
Indicates that an entity has the ability, right, or opportunity to obtain or use suitable housing.
-
E.
propertyStatus
Indicates the current condition, state, or classification assigned to a property within a given context (e.g., availability, legal standing, or operational state).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d398c7d4819091cb2f7e48948aeb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5a3d6d5e081909d8285e52cb753ba |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e48d16dd34819096e096d0c0e4c15c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:53 a.m.