Triple
T18793327
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arend Heyting |
E459570
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableFor |
P22
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Heyting arithmetic |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Heyting arithmetic | Statement: [Arend Heyting, notableFor, Heyting arithmetic]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Heyting arithmetic Context triple: [Arend Heyting, notableFor, Heyting arithmetic]
-
A.
Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation
The Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation is a foundational explanation of intuitionistic logic that interprets logical connectives and proofs in terms of explicit constructions and algorithms rather than classical truth values.
-
B.
Recursive Functions and Intuitionistic Mathematics
Recursive Functions and Intuitionistic Mathematics is a seminal work by Stephen Kleene that develops the theory of recursive (computable) functions within the framework of intuitionistic logic and mathematics.
-
C.
Hilbert’s program
Hilbert’s program was an influential early-20th-century initiative in the foundations of mathematics that sought to formalize all of mathematics and prove its consistency using finitistic methods.
-
D.
Curry–Howard correspondence
The Curry–Howard correspondence is a foundational principle in logic and computer science that establishes a deep analogy between proofs and programs, and between logical propositions and types in programming languages.
-
E.
Gentzen’s consistency proof for arithmetic
Gentzen’s consistency proof for arithmetic is a landmark 1930s result in proof theory that established the consistency of Peano arithmetic using transfinite induction up to the ordinal ε₀.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Heyting arithmetic Target entity description: Heyting arithmetic is a formal system of arithmetic based on intuitionistic logic, serving as the constructive counterpart to classical Peano arithmetic.
-
A.
Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation
The Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation is a foundational explanation of intuitionistic logic that interprets logical connectives and proofs in terms of explicit constructions and algorithms rather than classical truth values.
-
B.
Recursive Functions and Intuitionistic Mathematics
Recursive Functions and Intuitionistic Mathematics is a seminal work by Stephen Kleene that develops the theory of recursive (computable) functions within the framework of intuitionistic logic and mathematics.
-
C.
Hilbert’s program
Hilbert’s program was an influential early-20th-century initiative in the foundations of mathematics that sought to formalize all of mathematics and prove its consistency using finitistic methods.
-
D.
Curry–Howard correspondence
The Curry–Howard correspondence is a foundational principle in logic and computer science that establishes a deep analogy between proofs and programs, and between logical propositions and types in programming languages.
-
E.
Gentzen’s consistency proof for arithmetic
Gentzen’s consistency proof for arithmetic is a landmark 1930s result in proof theory that established the consistency of Peano arithmetic using transfinite induction up to the ordinal ε₀.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d396f54c8190ba49db31e8743842 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e59787e5988190883ed575ab4b6dec |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:03 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:53 a.m.