Triple
T18793218
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation |
E459568
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | constructive semantics |
C33914
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: constructive semantics Context triple: [Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation, instanceOf, constructive semantics]
-
A.
construction in proof theory
A construction in proof theory is a systematically defined method or procedure used within formal proofs to build objects, derive new statements, or transform existing proofs while preserving logical validity.
-
B.
nonclassical logic semantics
chosen
Nonclassical logic semantics is the study of meaning and truth conditions for logics that deviate from classical principles, such as by altering truth values, inference rules, or structural constraints.
-
C.
possible‑worlds semantics
Possible-worlds semantics is a formal framework in logic and linguistics that interprets the meaning of sentences by evaluating their truth across a range of alternative, systematically structured possible worlds.
-
D.
axiomatic semantics
Axiomatic semantics is a formal method for defining the meaning of programs by specifying logical assertions (preconditions and postconditions) that describe the behavior and correctness of program constructs.
-
E.
non-classical logic
Non-classical logic is a broad family of logical systems that modify or reject one or more principles of classical logic (such as bivalence, excluded middle, or monotonicity) to better model reasoning in contexts like vagueness, inconsistency, modality, or resource sensitivity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d396f54c8190ba49db31e8743842 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:53 a.m.