Triple

T18776125
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Stephenson 2 E459137 entity
Predicate isDifficultToObserveInVisible P132950 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Stephenson 2, isDifficultToObserveInVisible, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isDifficultToObserveInVisible
Context triple: [Stephenson 2, isDifficultToObserveInVisible, true]
  • A. visibleUnder
    Indicates that one entity can be seen or perceived when another specified condition, context, or covering entity is present or in effect.
  • B. notObservedIn
    Indicates that a particular entity, event, or property has not been detected, recorded, or seen within a specified context, dataset, or environment.
  • C. isEasierToSeeThan
    Indicates that one entity is more visually noticeable or discernible than another under comparable viewing conditions.
  • D. notObservedBy
    Indicates that an entity, event, or condition is not detected, recorded, or perceived by a specified observer or observation process.
  • E. notVisibleWhen
    Indicates that one entity is not visible whenever a specified condition, state, or context involving another entity holds.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d396f54c8190ba49db31e8743842 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5933b912481908bfd97216eacb257 completed April 20, 2026, 2:45 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e48d1126e4819099607837ed5aadca completed April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e49785fd7081909577e90a55df0a35 completed April 19, 2026, 8:51 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:52 a.m.