Triple
T18772954
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sun |
E459059
|
entity |
| Predicate | willEvolveInto |
P131358
|
FINISHED |
| Object | red giant |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: red giant | Statement: [Sun, willEvolveInto, red giant]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: willEvolveInto Context triple: [Sun, willEvolveInto, red giant]
-
A.
evolvesIn
Indicates that an entity undergoes a process of change or development within a specified environment, context, or medium.
-
B.
eventualEvolution
chosen
Indicates that one entity will, over time or through a series of changes, develop into or be transformed into another entity.
-
C.
evolves
Indicates that one entity undergoes a process of gradual change or development into another, typically more advanced or different, state or form.
-
D.
evolvedUnder
Indicates that one entity developed or changed over time while being influenced or shaped by specific conditions, factors, or an environment represented by the other entity.
-
E.
laterEvolvedIntoName
Indicates that one entity, typically an earlier form or version, subsequently developed or transformed into another entity identified by a later name.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d395dba0819087568404508590cb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e593378a4081909cc1b0856fce7d7d |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e48d1126e4819099607837ed5aadca |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:52 a.m.