Triple
T18771557
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lynds 1641 |
E459026
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAgeProperty |
P29430
|
FINISHED |
| Object | contains very young stellar population |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: contains very young stellar population | Statement: [Lynds 1641, hasAgeProperty, contains very young stellar population]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAgeProperty Context triple: [Lynds 1641, hasAgeProperty, contains very young stellar population]
-
A.
hasAge
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific age value, typically expressed as a number of time units since its birth or creation.
-
B.
containsAge
Indicates that one entity includes or specifies the age value or age-related information of another entity.
-
C.
hasAgeClaim
Indicates that an entity is associated with a stated or asserted age value, rather than necessarily its verified actual age.
-
D.
hasAgeFocus
chosen
Indicates a relationship where something is characterized or distinguished by a particular age group or age-related emphasis.
-
E.
hasRelativeAge
Indicates that one entity has an age that is defined or compared in relation to the age of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d395dba0819087568404508590cb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e59335a01881908731371be1e27a6b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e48d0b7b708190877951b6e6cdcbc4 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:52 a.m.