Triple

T18747199
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Homerite Kingdom E458433 entity
Predicate archaeologicalSite P1098 FINISHED
Object Zafar archaeological site NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Zafar archaeological site | Statement: [Homerite Kingdom, archaeologicalSite, Zafar archaeological site]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Zafar archaeological site
Context triple: [Homerite Kingdom, archaeologicalSite, Zafar archaeological site]
  • A. Dhiban archaeological site
    The Dhiban archaeological site is an important ancient settlement in modern-day Jordan, known for remains spanning from the Iron Age through the Islamic periods and for its association with the biblical and Moabite city of Dibon.
  • B. Al-Bass archaeological site
    Al-Bass archaeological site is an extensive ancient necropolis and Roman-Byzantine archaeological complex in Tyre, Lebanon, renowned for its well-preserved hippodrome, monumental arch, and funerary structures.
  • C. Shisr Archaeological Site
    Shisr Archaeological Site is an ancient desert settlement in Oman, identified with the fabled lost city of Ubar and noted for its role in the historic frankincense trade routes.
  • D. Zeugma archaeological site
    The Zeugma archaeological site is an ancient Greco-Roman city in southeastern Turkey renowned for its exceptionally well-preserved mosaics and rich cultural remains.
  • E. Zawada site
    The Zawada site is an archaeological location within Poland’s Krzemionki Prehistoric Striped Flint Mining Region, notable for its evidence of ancient flint extraction and associated prehistoric activity.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Zafar archaeological site
Target entity description: Zafar archaeological site is the ancient capital of the Himyarite (Homerite) Kingdom in modern-day Yemen, known for its extensive ruins and inscriptions that illuminate pre-Islamic South Arabian civilization.
  • A. Dhiban archaeological site
    The Dhiban archaeological site is an important ancient settlement in modern-day Jordan, known for remains spanning from the Iron Age through the Islamic periods and for its association with the biblical and Moabite city of Dibon.
  • B. Al-Bass archaeological site
    Al-Bass archaeological site is an extensive ancient necropolis and Roman-Byzantine archaeological complex in Tyre, Lebanon, renowned for its well-preserved hippodrome, monumental arch, and funerary structures.
  • C. Shisr Archaeological Site
    Shisr Archaeological Site is an ancient desert settlement in Oman, identified with the fabled lost city of Ubar and noted for its role in the historic frankincense trade routes.
  • D. Zeugma archaeological site
    The Zeugma archaeological site is an ancient Greco-Roman city in southeastern Turkey renowned for its exceptionally well-preserved mosaics and rich cultural remains.
  • E. Zawada site
    The Zawada site is an archaeological location within Poland’s Krzemionki Prehistoric Striped Flint Mining Region, notable for its evidence of ancient flint extraction and associated prehistoric activity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d394dc308190b6725073f5db324c completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e576936cf08190b3c0d2f4e8a616fc completed April 20, 2026, 12:42 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:51 a.m.