Triple
T1874273
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | David Mullins |
E39103
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalStandingAs |
P20024
|
FINISHED |
| Object | aggrieved party in discrimination complaint |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: aggrieved party in discrimination complaint | Statement: [David Mullins, hasLegalStandingAs, aggrieved party in discrimination complaint]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalStandingAs Context triple: [David Mullins, hasLegalStandingAs, aggrieved party in discrimination complaint]
-
A.
hasLegalStatus
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
-
B.
hasLegalRight
Indicates that an entity possesses an officially recognized legal entitlement or permission to perform an action or hold a claim regarding another entity.
-
C.
hasLegalAuthorityFrom
Indicates that one entity possesses formal legal power, rights, or authorization that originates from or is granted by another entity.
-
D.
hasLegalSubject
chosen
Indicates that an entity serves as the legal subject (e.g., rights-holder or obligated party) in a legal relationship or context.
-
E.
hasLegalForceIn
Indicates that something (such as a law, regulation, or agreement) is legally valid, binding, and enforceable within a specified jurisdiction or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8862f7074819096afe7fe65e179e9 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb0f79fbc819085c54f3189a552d9 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abafe2b56c81909e13d543982e6e13 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.