Triple
T18703825
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RPM Top Singles |
E457318
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWith |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RPM magazine charts |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RPM magazine charts | Statement: [RPM Top Singles, associatedWith, RPM magazine charts]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RPM magazine charts Context triple: [RPM Top Singles, associatedWith, RPM magazine charts]
-
A.
RPM magazine
chosen
RPM magazine was a Canadian music industry publication best known for compiling national record charts, including the influential RPM Top Singles chart.
-
B.
RPM Top Singles
RPM Top Singles was a Canadian music industry chart published by RPM magazine that ranked the most popular singles in Canada.
-
C.
RPM Country Tracks
RPM Country Tracks was a Canadian music industry chart that ranked the popularity of country music singles nationwide.
-
D.
RPM
RPM is a widely used package management system originally developed for Linux distributions to build, install, and manage software packages.
-
E.
RPM
RPM was a Canadian music industry trade magazine best known for publishing national record charts, including singles and albums rankings.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d392aad081909fe31aa03e6e97d1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5671597ac819093dbb53553130f1e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:49 a.m.