Triple
T18702797
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Roman, Romania |
E457292
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNearbyCity |
P350
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Piatra Neamț |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Piatra Neamț | Statement: [Roman, Romania, hasNearbyCity, Piatra Neamț]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Piatra Neamț Context triple: [Roman, Romania, hasNearbyCity, Piatra Neamț]
-
A.
Piatra Neamț
chosen
Piatra Neamț is a historic city in northeastern Romania, known for its picturesque setting in the Carpathian foothills and rich cultural heritage.
-
B.
Piatra-Olt
Piatra-Olt is a small town in southern Romania known as a local railway junction and administrative center within Olt County.
-
C.
Caransebeș
Caransebeș is a historic town in western Romania, situated in the Banat region and known as an important local cultural and transportation hub.
-
D.
Cernavodă
Cernavodă is a town in southeastern Romania best known for its major Danube–Black Sea Canal port and the nearby Cernavodă Nuclear Power Plant.
-
E.
Satu Mare
Satu Mare is a city in northwestern Romania near the Hungarian border, known as a regional economic and cultural center with a diverse ethnic heritage.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d392aad081909fe31aa03e6e97d1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e56714d0588190ac050356bc2784fd |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:49 a.m.