Triple
T18669858
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zenger trial |
E456443
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDefenseArgument |
P36520
|
FINISHED |
| Object | truth should be a defense to libel |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: truth should be a defense to libel | Statement: [Zenger trial, hasDefenseArgument, truth should be a defense to libel]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDefenseArgument Context triple: [Zenger trial, hasDefenseArgument, truth should be a defense to libel]
-
A.
defenseArgument
chosen
Indicates that an entity presents or supports a line of reasoning intended to defend or justify another entity, often in a legal or argumentative context.
-
B.
hasDefenseStrategy
Indicates that an entity employs or is associated with a particular plan or set of measures designed to protect against threats or attacks.
-
C.
defendedAs
Indicates that one entity is presented, argued, or justified as being equivalent to or serving the role of another entity in a defensive or protective context.
-
D.
hasDefensivePurpose
Indicates that something exists or is designed with the primary goal of protection, defense, or safeguarding against threats or harm.
-
E.
defendedOn
Indicates that one entity protected, supported, or argued in favor of another entity during a specific time or event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38f72b4819090a935175d9ca8af |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e556b1140c81908002c27a33c03ae2 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e478db7a248190a8c6584673773923 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:48 a.m.