Triple
T1866807
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | BOOTP |
E34939
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsRelayAgents |
P33253
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [BOOTP, supportsRelayAgents, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsRelayAgents Context triple: [BOOTP, supportsRelayAgents, yes]
-
A.
supportsRoamingWith
Indicates that one entity enables or is compatible with another entity’s ability to operate or be accessed while roaming across different networks or locations.
-
B.
supportsTraffic
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, carrying, or accommodating the flow or volume of traffic associated with another entity.
-
C.
supportsRouting
Indicates that one entity provides the capability to determine and direct paths or routes for another entity’s traffic, requests, or messages.
-
D.
supportsUse
Indicates that one entity enables, allows, or is compatible with the use or operation of another entity.
-
E.
supportsRelation
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, endorsement, or structural backing to another entity or its activity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88600b2f88190bc09303e68ab517e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb16c09e48190a345c95eab59fd87 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abafe02c3c819093a4744b476106ca |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abb16a6db48190af04012e8ed2269f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:02 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:34 p.m.