Triple
T18654997
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Helen Palsgraf |
E456036
|
entity |
| Predicate | partyStatusInAppeal |
P132166
|
FINISHED |
| Object | respondent |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: respondent | Statement: [Helen Palsgraf, partyStatusInAppeal, respondent]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partyStatusInAppeal Context triple: [Helen Palsgraf, partyStatusInAppeal, respondent]
-
A.
appealStatus
Indicates the current state or outcome of an appeal within a review or decision process.
-
B.
courtStatus
Indicates the current legal or procedural state of a case or matter within a court system.
-
C.
partyStatusAtSupremeCourt
Indicates the legal status or role a party holds in a case when it is before the Supreme Court.
-
D.
partyStatusContext
Indicates the contextual status or role a party holds within a specific situation, event, or legal/transactional framework.
-
E.
legalStatusOfProceedings
Indicates the current legal standing or condition of a set of legal proceedings within a judicial or administrative process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38ea1e88190997e9b231190ba6f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e55084012881909b9dd60565011c86 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e478d85864819093cbad5ed9b54878 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e484133ee48190a80f1889d79f34c9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:47 a.m.