Triple

T18649694
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Atticus E455896 entity
Predicate stanceOnProvidence P132886 FINISHED
Object strong defense of divine providence LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: strong defense of divine providence | Statement: [Atticus, stanceOnProvidence, strong defense of divine providence]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stanceOnProvidence
Context triple: [Atticus, stanceOnProvidence, strong defense of divine providence]
  • A. stanceOnProofs
    Indicates the position or attitude an entity holds regarding the use, value, or nature of proofs.
  • B. religiousConsequence
    Indicates a relationship where one event, action, or state leads to an outcome specifically defined or understood in religious terms (such as divine reward, punishment, obligation, or spiritual effect).
  • C. religiousPolicyOutcome
    Indicates the consequences or effects that a particular religious policy has on individuals, groups, or society.
  • D. religiousTopicAddressed
    Indicates that a subject deals with, discusses, or focuses on a religious theme, issue, or question.
  • E. mainFaith
    Indicates that one entity is the primary or predominant religious belief or faith tradition associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38ea1e88190997e9b231190ba6f completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5500fd7cc819095c5e742013b8d75 completed April 19, 2026, 9:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e478d85864819093cbad5ed9b54878 completed April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e484121cd48190bf583b4c94636a30 completed April 19, 2026, 7:28 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:47 a.m.