Triple

T186435
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject district courts of Japan E3990 entity
Predicate canOrder P6717 FINISHED
Object pretrial detention in criminal cases LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pretrial detention in criminal cases | Statement: [district courts of Japan, canOrder, pretrial detention in criminal cases]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canOrder
Context triple: [district courts of Japan, canOrder, pretrial detention in criminal cases]
  • A. hasOrder
    Indicates that one entity possesses, is associated with, or is characterized by a specific order, sequence, or arrangement relative to others.
  • B. orderType
    Indicates the specific category or classification of an order, such as its purpose, channel, or processing method.
  • C. orderFoundedBy
    Indicates that a particular order or organization was established or created by a specific person or entity.
  • D. order
    Indicates that one entity requests, arranges, or directs that another entity provide a good, service, or action, typically in a specified sequence or priority.
  • E. ordersBy
    Indicates that one entity arranges, sorts, or sequences another entity according to a specified criterion or set of criteria.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a25497e2f08190a040f8c6e1842643 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:36 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2594809288190b3d3b1283e7e0d00 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25670feb081908e26a2543ebe7b3a completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a257e763d081908c54ad57d8d3060d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:40 a.m.