Triple

T18643132
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Reference.com E455737 entity
Predicate hasEditorialStyle P132844 FINISHED
Object concise explanations LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: concise explanations | Statement: [Reference.com, hasEditorialStyle, concise explanations]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEditorialStyle
Context triple: [Reference.com, hasEditorialStyle, concise explanations]
  • A. hasEditorialContent
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with editorially created or curated content, such as articles, commentary, or opinion pieces.
  • B. hasEditorialFocus
    Indicates that an entity (such as a publication or section) is primarily concerned with or oriented around a particular editorial topic, theme, or subject area.
  • C. hasEditorialPage
    Indicates that an entity (typically a publication) includes or is associated with an editorial page.
  • D. hasEditorialStaff
    Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more people responsible for editing, reviewing, or curating its content.
  • E. hasEditorialMission
    Indicates that an entity maintains or follows a defined editorial mission or guiding editorial policy.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38ea1e88190997e9b231190ba6f completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e5500b6d7c8190b807b772980d913c completed April 19, 2026, 9:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e478d85864819093cbad5ed9b54878 completed April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e484121cd48190bf583b4c94636a30 completed April 19, 2026, 7:28 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:47 a.m.