Triple
T18626919
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | San Pedro Huamelula Chontal |
E455307
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Chontal language variety |
C40801
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Chontal language variety Context triple: [San Pedro Huamelula Chontal, instanceOf, Chontal language variety]
-
A.
Totonac language variety
A Totonac language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Totonac language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Totonacan language family.
-
B.
Kaqchikel language variety
The Kaqchikel language variety is a Mayan language spoken primarily in the central highlands of Guatemala, characterized by its agglutinative morphology, ergative-absolutive alignment, and rich system of aspect and status markers.
-
C.
Mazatec language variety
A Mazatec language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Mazatec language, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Mazatecan linguistic continuum.
-
D.
regional variety of the Kʼicheʼ language
A regional variety of the Kʼicheʼ language is a geographically and socially defined form of Kʼicheʼ characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features shared by speakers in a particular area.
-
E.
Totonacan language
A Totonacan language is a member of the Totonacan family of indigenous Mesoamerican languages spoken primarily in east-central Mexico, characterized by complex phonology and verb morphology.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38cc7948190a55ea64e5638994e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:46 a.m.