Triple
T18621596
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Coryell County |
E455163
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Evant, Texas |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Evant, Texas | Statement: [Coryell County, hasCity, Evant, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Evant, Texas Context triple: [Coryell County, hasCity, Evant, Texas]
-
A.
Evant, Texas
chosen
Evant, Texas is a small rural town in Central Texas known for its agricultural community and location at the junction of U.S. Highway 84 and State Highway 281.
-
B.
Evadale, Texas
Evadale, Texas is a small unincorporated community in Southeast Texas known for its rural character and proximity to the Neches River.
-
C.
Everman, Texas
Everman, Texas is a small suburban city in the Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area known for its residential character and proximity to Fort Worth.
-
D.
Easton, Texas
Easton, Texas is a small rural city in East Texas known for its quiet residential character and proximity to the larger communities of Rusk and Gregg counties.
-
E.
Navasota, Texas
Navasota, Texas is a small city in Grimes County that serves as a historic railroad and commercial hub within the Greater Houston metropolitan area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38cc7948190a55ea64e5638994e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e54f0146f48190a872032db6e660c6 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:54 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:46 a.m.