Triple

T18621258
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject House of Commons divisions E455153 entity
Predicate hasAccountabilityRole P132434 FINISHED
Object enables constituents to see how their MP voted LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: enables constituents to see how their MP voted | Statement: [House of Commons divisions, hasAccountabilityRole, enables constituents to see how their MP voted]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAccountabilityRole
Context triple: [House of Commons divisions, hasAccountabilityRole, enables constituents to see how their MP voted]
  • A. hasAccountabilitySystem
    Indicates that an entity has a defined mechanism or structure in place for assigning, tracking, and enforcing responsibility for actions or outcomes.
  • B. hasLegalRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific legal capacity, status, or function in relation to another entity or context.
  • C. hasCustodyRole
    Indicates that one entity holds a specific custodial responsibility or role in relation to another entity.
  • D. hasSafetyRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a responsibility or function related to safety within a given context or system.
  • E. accountabilityTo
    Indicates that one entity is responsible for explaining, justifying, or answering for its actions, decisions, or outcomes to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38cc7948190a55ea64e5638994e completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e54f0146f48190a872032db6e660c6 completed April 19, 2026, 9:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e478d4a7948190a4bb9223bb5dddfc completed April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e485f5d1588190b44f31cbc54c0a9d completed April 19, 2026, 7:36 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:46 a.m.