Triple
T18617465
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kuzakov |
E455066
|
entity |
| Predicate | etymologicalPattern |
P132797
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Slavic patronymic formation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Slavic patronymic formation | Statement: [Kuzakov, etymologicalPattern, Slavic patronymic formation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: etymologicalPattern Context triple: [Kuzakov, etymologicalPattern, Slavic patronymic formation]
-
A.
etymologicalForm
Indicates that one linguistic form is derived from, or historically originates in, another form as its etymological source.
-
B.
etymologicalField
Indicates that one term belongs to a particular semantic or conceptual domain relevant to its etymological origin or historical development.
-
C.
etymologicalLanguage
Indicates the language from which a word or term is historically derived in its etymology.
-
D.
etymologyType
Indicates the specific kind or category of etymological relationship that links a term to its linguistic origin or source.
-
E.
etymologicalNote
Indicates that there is a note explaining the origin, historical development, or source language of a term or name.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38bbe7c8190bdec3138e7d413c9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e54d06c1f8819094fbfa56eca07eaa |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e478cf5e888190a0b1074b0c6525df |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e484121cd48190bf583b4c94636a30 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:46 a.m.