Triple

T18607494
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lansing USD 469 E454794 entity
Predicate jurisdiction P82 FINISHED
Object City of Lansing, Kansas NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: City of Lansing, Kansas | Statement: [Lansing USD 469, jurisdiction, City of Lansing, Kansas]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: City of Lansing, Kansas
Context triple: [Lansing USD 469, jurisdiction, City of Lansing, Kansas]
  • A. Lansing, Kansas chosen
    Lansing, Kansas is a small city in Leavenworth County known for housing the Lansing Correctional Facility and serving as part of the greater Kansas City metropolitan area.
  • B. Scott City, Kansas
    Scott City, Kansas is a small rural city in western Kansas that serves as the commercial and agricultural hub of Scott County.
  • C. White City, Kansas
    White City, Kansas is a small rural town in Morris County that forms part of the Manhattan, Kansas metropolitan area.
  • D. Langdon, Kansas
    Langdon, Kansas is a small rural community located in Reno County in the central part of the U.S. state of Kansas.
  • E. Hartford, Kansas
    Hartford, Kansas is a small rural city in east-central Kansas known for its close-knit community and agricultural surroundings.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38bbe7c8190bdec3138e7d413c9 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e547552a648190839cd8cdfed15e12 completed April 19, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:45 a.m.