Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Mabo v Queensland (No 2) | Statement: [Murray Island, legalStatusRecognizedIn, Mabo v Queensland (No 2)]

Target entity: Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
Context triple: [Murray Island, legalStatusRecognizedIn, Mabo v Queensland (No 2)]

• A. Mabo v Queensland (No 2) chosen
  Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
• B. Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976
  The Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 is a landmark Australian federal law that first recognized and granted inalienable freehold title to traditional Aboriginal landowners in the Northern Territory, establishing a framework for land councils and Indigenous land claims.
• C. Dunghutti People v Commonwealth of Australia (native title case)
  Dunghutti People v Commonwealth of Australia is a landmark Australian native title case in which the Dunghutti people secured one of the first formal recognitions of Indigenous land rights on the New South Wales mainland.
• D. New South Wales Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983
  The New South Wales Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 is an Australian state law that provides a framework for Aboriginal land councils to claim, manage, and benefit from certain Crown lands in New South Wales as a form of land rights recognition.
• E. Wik Peoples v Queensland
  Wik Peoples v Queensland is a landmark 1996 High Court of Australia case that held native title rights could coexist with pastoral leases, significantly shaping Australian land and Indigenous rights law.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: legalStatusRecognizedIn
Context triple: [Murray Island, legalStatusRecognizedIn, Mabo v Queensland (No 2)]

• A. countryOfRecognition
  Indicates the country that formally recognizes, acknowledges, or grants official status to a given entity.
• B. legalRecognition
  Indicates that an authority formally acknowledges the validity, status, or rights associated with an entity, relationship, or action under the law.
• C. hasRefugeeStatusRecognizedBy
  Indicates that an entity’s refugee status has been formally recognized or granted by a specified authority or organization.
• D. legalStatusInHomeland
  Indicates the legal status or classification an entity holds within its country or place of origin.
• E. legalStatusInDiaspora
  Indicates the legal status or classification an entity holds while residing outside its country or place of origin.
• F. None of above. chosen