Triple
T18593756
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bhishmaparvan |
E454434
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesPhilosophicalContent |
P58526
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Bhishmaparvan, includesPhilosophicalContent, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesPhilosophicalContent Context triple: [Bhishmaparvan, includesPhilosophicalContent, yes]
-
A.
hasPhilosophicalContent
chosen
Indicates that something contains or expresses ideas, themes, or discussions related to philosophy or philosophical inquiry.
-
B.
hasPhilosophyAbout
Indicates that one entity holds, develops, or expresses a philosophical view, theory, or stance concerning another entity or subject.
-
C.
hasPhilosophicalInterestIn
Indicates that one entity holds a philosophical curiosity, concern, or engagement regarding another entity.
-
D.
philosophicalTheme
Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
-
E.
philosophicalContributor
Indicates that one entity has made a significant contribution to the philosophical work, ideas, or discourse associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38ae7e081908a98df1251842402 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e545b7ce3881908302ee27a2cf80d6 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e478c98d4c81909d37a0e72c6e7bd0 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:44 a.m.