Triple

T18592411
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Höchstadt an der Aisch E454401 entity
Predicate hasHistoricTownFortifications P29117 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Höchstadt an der Aisch, hasHistoricTownFortifications, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricTownFortifications
Context triple: [Höchstadt an der Aisch, hasHistoricTownFortifications, true]
  • A. containsHistoricFort
    Indicates that a place or area includes within its boundaries a historic fort.
  • B. hasHistoricTownWallsRemnants chosen
    Indicates that remnants of historic town walls are present and associated with the subject entity.
  • C. containsHistoricTown
    Indicates that one entity geographically includes or encompasses a town that has recognized historical significance.
  • D. hasCastleTownHistory
    Indicates that an entity has a historical association with a castle town, such as originating from, being located in, or significantly shaped by one.
  • E. separatesHistoricTownsOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as a dividing line or barrier between two or more historic towns.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38ae7e081908a98df1251842402 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e545b6792481908eae92718aa4c889 completed April 19, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e478c98d4c81909d37a0e72c6e7bd0 completed April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:44 a.m.