Triple
T18588700
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sword of Gryffindor |
E454303
|
entity |
| Predicate | enchantedToAppearTo |
P132692
|
FINISHED |
| Object | worthy Gryffindor students |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: worthy Gryffindor students | Statement: [Sword of Gryffindor, enchantedToAppearTo, worthy Gryffindor students]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: enchantedToAppearTo Context triple: [Sword of Gryffindor, enchantedToAppearTo, worthy Gryffindor students]
-
A.
enchantedAs
Indicates that one entity has been placed under a magical spell or charm by another entity or force.
-
B.
enchantedBy
Indicates that one entity has cast or holds a magical enchantment over another entity.
-
C.
enchantable
Indicates that an entity is capable of being affected by or imbued with magical enchantments.
-
D.
chantedAt
Indicates that one entity directed chanting or rhythmic vocal expressions toward another entity as the target or audience.
-
E.
perceivedByWizardsAs
Indicates that something is regarded or understood in a particular way specifically from the perspective of wizards.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8d38ae7e081908a98df1251842402 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e545b3e564819088e60fc25d1976f0 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e478c98d4c81909d37a0e72c6e7bd0 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e484121cd48190bf583b4c94636a30 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:44 a.m.