Triple

T18587107
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Proto-Insular Celtic E454261 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Insular Celtic hypothesis NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Insular Celtic hypothesis | Statement: [Proto-Insular Celtic, relatedTo, Insular Celtic hypothesis]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Insular Celtic hypothesis
Context triple: [Proto-Insular Celtic, relatedTo, Insular Celtic hypothesis]
  • A. Italo-Celtic hypothesis
    The Italo-Celtic hypothesis is a linguistic theory proposing that the Italic and Celtic branches of the Indo-European language family share a common intermediate ancestor or period of close contact, based on shared structural and lexical innovations.
  • B. Austric hypothesis
    The Austric hypothesis is a proposed but controversial macro-family theory suggesting a common origin for several language families of Southeast Asia and the Pacific, including Austroasiatic and Austronesian.
  • C. Nostratic hypothesis
    The Nostratic hypothesis is a controversial linguistic theory proposing that several major language families of Eurasia and sometimes beyond share a common ancestral proto-language.
  • D. Finno-Ugric hypothesis
    The Finno-Ugric hypothesis is a linguistic theory proposing that the Finno-Ugric languages share a common ancestral language and form a distinct branch within the Uralic language family.
  • E. Hokan hypothesis
    The Hokan hypothesis is a proposed linguistic grouping that suggests several Native American language families of western North America may share a common ancestral origin.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Insular Celtic hypothesis
Target entity description: The Insular Celtic hypothesis is a linguistic theory proposing that the Celtic languages of the British Isles share a common intermediate ancestor and distinctive innovations that set them apart from Continental Celtic languages.
  • A. Italo-Celtic hypothesis
    The Italo-Celtic hypothesis is a linguistic theory proposing that the Italic and Celtic branches of the Indo-European language family share a common intermediate ancestor or period of close contact, based on shared structural and lexical innovations.
  • B. Austric hypothesis
    The Austric hypothesis is a proposed but controversial macro-family theory suggesting a common origin for several language families of Southeast Asia and the Pacific, including Austroasiatic and Austronesian.
  • C. Nostratic hypothesis
    The Nostratic hypothesis is a controversial linguistic theory proposing that several major language families of Eurasia and sometimes beyond share a common ancestral proto-language.
  • D. Finno-Ugric hypothesis
    The Finno-Ugric hypothesis is a linguistic theory proposing that the Finno-Ugric languages share a common ancestral language and form a distinct branch within the Uralic language family.
  • E. Hokan hypothesis
    The Hokan hypothesis is a proposed linguistic grouping that suggests several Native American language families of western North America may share a common ancestral origin.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8d38ae7e081908a98df1251842402 completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e545b2f20481908da74447cd08d5bd completed April 19, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 11:44 a.m.