Triple
T1857121
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Escambia County, Alabama |
E41727
|
entity |
| Predicate | countySeat |
P383
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Brewton, Alabama |
E213000
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brewton, Alabama | Statement: [Escambia County, Alabama, countySeat, Brewton, Alabama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Brewton, Alabama Context triple: [Escambia County, Alabama, countySeat, Brewton, Alabama]
-
A.
Brent, Alabama
Brent, Alabama is a small city in central Alabama known for its rural character and location within Bibb County.
-
B.
Lanett, Alabama
Lanett, Alabama is a small city in eastern Alabama near the Georgia border, historically tied to the textile industry and the Chattahoochee River region.
-
C.
East Brewton, Alabama
chosen
East Brewton, Alabama is a small city in southern Alabama located across the Conecuh River from Brewton in Escambia County.
-
D.
Riverside, Alabama
Riverside, Alabama is a small community in St. Clair County known for its location along the Coosa River in central Alabama.
-
E.
Waverly, Alabama
Waverly, Alabama is a small rural town in eastern Alabama known for its tight-knit community and historic Southern character.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8864a83848190a4ec02721306c511 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb07fc5f08190a195a2f24d7b858a |
completed | March 7, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b224711a908190b4be9dfcd7737edd |
completed | March 12, 2026, 2:26 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m.