Triple

T1857093
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject James Iredell Sr. E41726 entity
Predicate notableWork P4 FINISHED
Object Opinion in Chisholm v. Georgia E115611 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Opinion in Chisholm v. Georgia | Statement: [James Iredell Sr., notableWork, Opinion in Chisholm v. Georgia]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Opinion in Chisholm v. Georgia
Context triple: [James Iredell Sr., notableWork, Opinion in Chisholm v. Georgia]
  • A. Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. Georgia
    The Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793) was an early and controversial ruling that allowed a citizen of one state to sue another state in federal court, prompting the swift adoption of the Eleventh Amendment to limit such suits.
  • B. Chisholm v. Georgia chosen
    Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
  • C. Gibbons v. Ogden
    Gibbons v. Ogden was an 1824 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed federal power over interstate commerce, significantly strengthening national authority relative to the states.
  • D. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
    Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was an 1831 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Cherokee Nation was a "domestic dependent nation" lacking standing to sue as a foreign nation, a ruling that shaped federal Indian law and the context of Indian Removal.
  • E. Worcester v. Georgia
    Worcester v. Georgia was an 1832 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that states had no authority to impose laws on Native American tribal lands, affirming tribal sovereignty in the face of federal Indian Removal policies.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8864a83848190a4ec02721306c511 completed March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb07fc5f08190a195a2f24d7b858a completed March 7, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69add1cb5b708190a0b89b157ea9da58 completed March 8, 2026, 7:45 p.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m.